Immigrants from North America vs Eastern European Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,174,767 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,944,660 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 48.6%, a difference of 0.51%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from North America	Eastern European
Minimum	9.5%	16.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	90.5%	84.0%
Mean	53.2%	58.8%
Median	51.3%	55.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	46.3%	47.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	56.3%	69.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.0%	22.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.6%	19.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.3%	19.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Eastern Europeans by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Samoan (48.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Irish (48.6%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Austrian (48.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Samoans	99.4 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 48.7%
Eastern Europeans	99.3 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 48.6%
Irish	99.3 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 48.6%
Whites/Caucasians	99.3 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 48.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.3 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 48.6%
Austrians	99.3 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 48.6%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.3 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 48.6%
Poles	99.2 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 48.5%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.2 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 48.5%
Czechoslovakians	99.2 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 48.5%
Croatians	99.1 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 48.5%
Bulgarians	99.1 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 48.5%
Luxembourgers	99.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 48.5%
Basques	99.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 48.4%
Northern Europeans	99.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.0 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 48.4%
Jordanians	98.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 48.4%
Romanians	98.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	98.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| China	98.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| North America	98.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 48.4%