Immigrants from Ghana vs Aleut Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Aleut
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Aleuts
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Aleut Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,806,163 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,774,066 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 63.4%, a difference of 0.070%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Aleut |
Minimum | 35.6% | 19.2% |
Maximum | 85.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.4% | 80.8% |
Mean | 64.2% | 66.1% |
Median | 63.8% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 54.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.4% | 77.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Aleuts by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (63.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Dominica (63.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Dominican (63.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Russian (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |