Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Aleut Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Aleut
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Aleuts
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Aleut Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,978,425 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 63.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,774,066 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 63.4%, a difference of 0.20%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Dominican Republic | Aleut |
| Minimum | 46.0% | 19.2% |
| Maximum | 85.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.6% | 80.8% |
| Mean | 64.8% | 66.1% |
| Median | 64.7% | 65.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.3% | 54.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 77.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Aleuts by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic are Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Luxembourger (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |