Immigrants from Belarus vs Norwegian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Norwegian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Norwegians
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Norwegian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,177,512 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265 and weighted average of 63.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,913,401 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.33%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 33.4% | 33.3% |
| Maximum | 90.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.9% | 66.7% |
| Mean | 65.8% | 66.0% |
| Median | 64.9% | 64.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 61.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 68.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Norwegians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from South Africa (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |