Immigrants from North America vs Norwegian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Norwegian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Norwegians
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
20.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Norwegian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,193,298 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,913,401 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.17%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Norwegian |
Minimum | 37.5% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.5% | 66.7% |
Mean | 65.7% | 66.0% |
Median | 63.1% | 64.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.1% | 61.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.4% | 68.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Norwegians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Paiute (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 25.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 64.1% |
Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |