Filipino vs Pima Family Households
COMPARE
Filipino
Pima
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Filipinos
Pima
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Pima Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,177,261 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Pima |
Minimum | 50.0% | 40.4% |
Maximum | 88.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 38.3% | 59.6% |
Mean | 71.2% | 69.9% |
Median | 69.9% | 68.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.5% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 80.0% | 76.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |