Slavic vs Pima Family Households
COMPARE
Slavic
Pima
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Slavs
Pima
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
18.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Pima Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,816,335 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Pima |
| Minimum | 39.7% | 40.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 60.3% | 59.6% |
| Mean | 65.7% | 69.9% |
| Median | 65.4% | 68.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.1% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.4% | 76.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 11.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
| French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |