Portuguese vs Romanian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Portuguese
Romanian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Portuguese
Romanians
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
77.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Romanian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,747,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,533,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.20%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Romanian |
| Minimum | 14.0% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 76.1% |
| Range | 23.5% | 72.4% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 29.3% |
| Median | 26.7% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.4% | 31.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Romanians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Argentinean (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (27.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Osage (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Menominee (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Brazilians | 79.6 /100 | #144 | Good 27.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 27.7% |
| Basques | 79.5 /100 | #146 | Good 27.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
| Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
| Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |