Czech vs Romanian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Czech
Romanian
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Czechs
Romanians
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Romanian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,997,416 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 370,877,474 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.72%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Romanian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 9.2% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 47.0% | 90.8% |
Mean | 15.7% | 27.2% |
Median | 14.0% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 35.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 22.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Romanians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Syrian (12.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North America (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (12.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Fiji (12.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Canada (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Western Asia (12.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovene (12.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Mongolian (12.8%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 93.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Mongolians | 93.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 93.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Romanians | 92.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 92.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Slovenes | 92.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 91.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Czechs | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Syrians | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 89.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 88.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 13.0% |
Serbians | 87.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 13.0% |