Central American Indian vs Swiss Family Households
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Swiss
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Central American Indians
Swiss
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Swiss Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,567 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 65.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,763,466 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 65.2%, a difference of 0.060%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Swiss |
| Minimum | 38.5% | 36.4% |
| Maximum | 91.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 52.8% | 63.6% |
| Mean | 67.5% | 74.1% |
| Median | 66.9% | 72.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.1% | 67.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.4% | 80.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Swiss by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Syria (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Chilean (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (65.1%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (65.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (65.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Syria (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Hopi (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |