Central American Indian vs Scandinavian Family Households
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Scandinavian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Central American Indians
Scandinavians
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Scandinavian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,567 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 65.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,285,900 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064 and weighted average of 65.0%, a difference of 0.22%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Scandinavian |
Minimum | 38.5% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 91.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.8% | 88.9% |
Mean | 67.5% | 65.7% |
Median | 66.9% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.1% | 63.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.4% | 73.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 20.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Scandinavians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Syria (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Chilean (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are European (65.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (65.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |