Brazilian vs Pakistani Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Brazilian
Pakistani
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Brazilians
Pakistanis
30.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.5%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Pakistani Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,585,920 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 30.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,371,382 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 30.5%, a difference of 0.33%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 74.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 69.6% | 89.3% |
| Mean | 30.9% | 43.3% |
| Median | 29.4% | 32.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 28.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.7% | 59.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 31.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 25.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 25.0% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Pakistanis by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Scotland (30.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (30.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Morocco (30.4%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (30.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (30.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Swiss (30.5%, a difference of 0.020%), South African (30.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uganda (30.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (30.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Czech (30.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
| New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Brazilians | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Swiss | 83.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
| South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |