Immigrants from Latin America vs Tohono O'odham College, Under 1 year

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,640,127 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with at least college, under 1 year education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.589 and weighted average of 56.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,730,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with at least college, under 1 year education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.433 and weighted average of 52.8%, a difference of 6.7%.

College, Under 1 year Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Latin America	Tohono O'odham
Minimum	5.7%	11.6%
Maximum	72.4%	78.8%
Range	66.6%	67.2%
Mean	48.7%	39.3%
Median	50.0%	37.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	40.7%	29.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	58.5%	50.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.7%	20.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.4%	15.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.3%	14.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Tohono O'odham by College, Under 1 year

In terms of college, under 1 year, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from El Salvador (56.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Navajo (56.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guatemala (56.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Cape Verdean (56.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Cuba (55.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Yakama (52.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Mexico (53.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (53.7%, a difference of 1.7%), Spanish American Indian (54.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (54.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	College, Under 1 year
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 56.4%
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 56.3%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 56.3%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 56.2%
Cape Verdeans	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 56.0%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 55.7%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 55.6%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 55.5%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 55.3%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 55.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 54.7%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 54.6%
Pennsylvania Germans	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 54.5%
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 54.4%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 54.2%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 54.0%
Spanish American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 54.0%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 53.7%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 53.7%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 52.8%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 52.6%