White/Caucasian vs Malaysian Vision Disability
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Malaysian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Malaysians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Malaysian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,529,348 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.619 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,017,600 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 2.3%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Malaysian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.52% |
Maximum | 4.3% | 12.2% |
Range | 2.2% | 11.7% |
Mean | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.41% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.41% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Malaysians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Panama (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.3%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from West Indies (2.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |