White/Caucasian vs British West Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
 British West Indian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
British West Indians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs British West Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,529,348 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.619 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,656,030 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.010%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | British West Indian | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.69% | 
| Maximum | 4.3% | 4.9% | 
| Range | 2.2% | 4.2% | 
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.5% | 
| Median | 2.5% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50% | 0.88% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.41% | 0.81% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.41% | 0.80% | 
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and British West Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |