Immigrants from Laos vs British West Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
 British West Indian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
British West Indians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos vs British West Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,435,761 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,656,030 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Laos | British West Indian | 
| Minimum | 0.41% | 0.69% | 
| Maximum | 8.3% | 4.9% | 
| Range | 7.8% | 4.2% | 
| Mean | 2.7% | 2.5% | 
| Median | 2.3% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.88% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 0.81% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 0.80% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos and British West Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and French (2.3%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |