Turkish vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vision Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Hong Kong
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,748,480 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,892,306 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 1.8%, a difference of 5.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 0.24% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 4.0% |
| Range | 6.8% | 3.7% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Median | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 0.48% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 0.48% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Pakistan (1.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Asian (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Singapore (1.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Iranian (1.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Israel (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Iran (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |