Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Central American Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Central American Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Central American Indians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
58.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Central American Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 402,703,105 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,071,152 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 17.4%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Central American Indian |
Minimum | 0.74% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 22.0% | 32.9% |
Range | 21.2% | 30.3% |
Mean | 7.6% | 9.9% |
Median | 6.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |