Tsimshian vs Navajo Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Navajo
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Tsimshian
Navajo
32.9%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Navajo Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,620,176 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 32.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,352,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Navajo |
Minimum | 13.0% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 65.3% | 77.8% |
Range | 52.3% | 68.3% |
Mean | 37.2% | 39.5% |
Median | 35.4% | 38.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.6% | 27.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.6% | 48.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.0% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Navajo by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Lumbee (32.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Alaskan Athabascan (32.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Houma (32.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 0.72%), Lumbee (32.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 2.4%), Alaskan Athabascan (32.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and Houma (32.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 37.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 38.6% |