Tlingit-Haida vs Scottish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Scottish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Scottish
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Scottish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,848,336 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,616,487 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 0.88%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Scottish |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 62.5% |
| Range | 24.0% | 59.4% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 13.4% |
| Median | 7.6% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Scottish by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.030%), German (6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Spaniard (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Welsh (6.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |