Syrian vs Czechoslovakian Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Syrian
Czechoslovakian
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Syrians
Czechoslovakians
22.3%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.0%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Czechoslovakian Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,020,222 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,238,154 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366 and weighted average of 23.0%, a difference of 3.1%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 98.3% | 97.9% |
| Mean | 22.9% | 29.0% |
| Median | 21.2% | 24.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.1% | 18.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 65 to 74
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from South America (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Ukrainian (22.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Serbian (22.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Peru (22.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Laotian (22.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Peruvians | 96.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 22.2% |
| Slovenes | 96.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 22.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 96.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Albanians | 95.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 95.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Serbians | 95.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Syrians | 95.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Ukrainians | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Laotians | 94.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Brazilians | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Swedes | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Austrians | 94.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 93.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 22.4% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are British (23.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Asia (23.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Sri Lankan (23.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Slavic (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (23.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Canadians | 77.7 /100 | #150 | Good 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 77.6 /100 | #151 | Good 22.9% |
| Finns | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 22.9% |
| Slavs | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 23.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 74.0 /100 | #154 | Good 23.0% |
| British | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 73.8 /100 | #156 | Good 23.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 72.4 /100 | #157 | Good 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 23.1% |
| South American Indians | 65.5 /100 | #159 | Good 23.1% |
| Koreans | 64.2 /100 | #160 | Good 23.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 63.8 /100 | #161 | Good 23.1% |
| Europeans | 61.2 /100 | #162 | Good 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 61.1 /100 | #163 | Good 23.2% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 60.9 /100 | #164 | Good 23.2% |