Swedish vs Immigrants from Austria Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Swedish
Immigrants from Austria
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Swedes
Immigrants from Austria
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
78.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Immigrants from Austria Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,852,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,968,225 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.39%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Immigrants from Austria |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 15.3% |
| Range | 46.9% | 13.8% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.7% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Immigrants from Austria by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Greek (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Syrian (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |