Swedish vs Immigrants from Central America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Swedish
Immigrants from Central America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Swedes
Immigrants from Central America
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Immigrants from Central America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,852,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,120,353 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Immigrants from Central America |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 26.4% |
| Range | 46.9% | 25.2% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 6.5% |
| Median | 6.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 0.85% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Swedes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |