Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Austria Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Immigrants from Austria
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Nicaraguans
Immigrants from Austria
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
63.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
78.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Austria Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,681,314 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,968,225 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nicaraguan | Immigrants from Austria |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 9.8% | 15.3% |
| Range | 7.8% | 13.8% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Immigrants from Austria by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Lebanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Greek (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Syrian (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |