Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Romania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Romania
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Romania |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 18.7% | 16.3% |
| Range | 16.8% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Romania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |