Serbian vs Bhutanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Serbian
Bhutanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Serbians
Bhutanese
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Bhutanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,596,356 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 6.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.28% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 14.0% |
| Range | 23.2% | 13.8% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 6.2% |
| Median | 7.1% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |