Immigrants from Greece vs Bhutanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Greece
Bhutanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Greece
Bhutanese
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Greece vs Bhutanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,870,944 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 4.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Greece | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.28% |
Maximum | 34.2% | 14.0% |
Range | 32.5% | 13.8% |
Mean | 7.1% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Greece by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Greece are Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |