Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Bhutanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Bhutanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Bhutanese
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Bhutanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,147,957 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.94%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 2.5% | 0.28% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 14.0% |
Range | 10.4% | 13.8% |
Mean | 6.0% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |