Samoan vs Lebanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Samoan
Lebanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Samoans
Lebanese
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Lebanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,100,241 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,493,679 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 3.5%.
![Samoan vs Lebanese Hearing Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/hearing-disability/samoans-vs-lebanese-hearing-disability-chart.webp)
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | Lebanese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 8.0% | 17.8% |
Range | 6.9% | 17.4% |
Mean | 3.9% | 5.0% |
Median | 3.7% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 4.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Lebanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Netherlands (3.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (3.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (3.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Western Europe (3.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Austria (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Mexican (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
Yugoslavians | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.3% |