Pima vs Dutch Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Pima
Dutch
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Pima
Dutch
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Dutch Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,868,421 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 0.74%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Dutch |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.93% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 29.5% |
| Range | 12.0% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Dutch by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Menominee (3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Pennsylvania German (3.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), German (3.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and French (3.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
| English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.8% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 3.8% |