Nonimmigrants vs Cape Verdean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Cape Verdean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Cape Verdeans
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Cape Verdean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 584,325,810 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,569,251 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 0.75%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Cape Verdean |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 19.8% |
| Range | 18.8% | 15.8% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 7.9% |
| Median | 5.8% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Cape Verdeans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from Dominica (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Scotch-Irish (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.27%), West Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Cheyenne (6.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Crow (6.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Cheyenne (6.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |