Mexican vs Tlingit-Haida Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican
Tlingit-Haida
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mexicans
Tlingit-Haida
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Tlingit-Haida Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,662,817 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,848,336 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican | Tlingit-Haida |
Minimum | 4.5% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 8.9% | 25.7% |
Range | 4.4% | 24.0% |
Mean | 6.5% | 8.0% |
Median | 6.4% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 9.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.72% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.72% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Mexicans and Tlingit-Haida by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Czechoslovakian (6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.030%), German (6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Spaniard (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |