Mexican American Indian vs West Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
West Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
West Indians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs West Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,438,641 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,927,950 people shows no correlation between the proportion of West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.90%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | West Indian |
Minimum | 0.16% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 20.9% | 5.0% |
Range | 20.8% | 3.9% |
Mean | 3.4% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.71% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 0.83% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 0.82% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and West Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Belize (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |