Alsatian vs West Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
West Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Alsatians
West Indians
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs West Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,677,708 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,927,950 people shows no correlation between the proportion of West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alsatian | West Indian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 5.0% |
| Range | 5.6% | 3.9% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.71% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.83% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 0.82% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and West Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from West Indies (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |