Mexican American Indian vs British Female Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
British
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
British
12.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
24.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs British Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,566,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,338,456 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.77%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | British |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 35.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.3% | 93.8% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 25.6% |
| Median | 12.8% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 24.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 23.9% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and British by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Honduran (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Somali (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ute (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Hondurans | 25.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 12.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 24.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.7 /100 | #199 | Fair 12.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 22.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 12.3% |
| Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
| Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
| Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
| Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
| Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
| British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |