Marshallese vs Native Hawaiian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Marshallese
Native Hawaiian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Marshallese
Native Hawaiians
3.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Native Hawaiian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,761,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 3.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,966,611 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 3.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Native Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 0.70% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 9.4% |
| Range | 7.4% | 8.7% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Median | 4.5% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Native Hawaiians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are French Canadian (3.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Ottawa (3.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Scotch-Irish (3.8%, a difference of 0.64%), English (3.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and French (3.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
| English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.8% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 3.8% |