Lumbee vs Swiss Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Lumbee
Swiss
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Lumbee
Swiss
17.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
18.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Swiss Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,257,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,639,334 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 52.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Swiss |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 48.5% | 34.6% |
| Range | 44.2% | 33.2% |
| Mean | 22.1% | 13.0% |
| Median | 21.6% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Basque (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kenya (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Guatemala (11.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Panama (11.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and British (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Africa | 29.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 27.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.5% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 25.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.5% |
| Iraqis | 24.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 20.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.6% |
| Basques | 19.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.6% |
| Swiss | 18.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |
| British | 17.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.6% |
| Nigerians | 16.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.6% |
| Slavs | 15.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 14.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.7% |
| Ghanaians | 14.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.7% |