Liberian vs Immigrants from Laos Vision Disability
COMPARE
Liberian
Immigrants from Laos
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Liberians
Immigrants from Laos
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Immigrants from Laos Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,074,683 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,435,761 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.19%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Immigrants from Laos |
Minimum | 0.37% | 0.41% |
Maximum | 8.7% | 8.3% |
Range | 8.3% | 7.8% |
Mean | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Immigrants from Laos by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |