Immigrants from Belize vs Immigrants from Laos Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belize
Immigrants from Laos
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belize
Immigrants from Laos
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belize vs Immigrants from Laos Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,278,815 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,435,761 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belize | Immigrants from Laos |
Minimum | 0.34% | 0.41% |
Maximum | 9.1% | 8.3% |
Range | 8.7% | 7.8% |
Mean | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Laos by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Immigrants from Liberia (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |