Kenyan vs Ghanaian Disability Age Under 5
COMPARE
Kenyan
 Ghanaian
 Disability Age Under 5
Disability Age Under 5 Comparison
Kenyans
Ghanaians
1.2%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.2%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
76.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Ghanaian Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,614,318 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 1.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,583,107 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017 and weighted average of 1.2%, a difference of 0.050%.
 
Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kenyan | Ghanaian | 
| Minimum | 0.82% | 0.20% | 
| Maximum | 8.8% | 5.3% | 
| Range | 8.0% | 5.1% | 
| Mean | 2.8% | 1.5% | 
| Median | 1.7% | 1.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 0.94% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 1.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.97% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 0.94% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 0.93% | 
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Ghanaians by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are South American (1.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Icelander (1.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Yaqui (1.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Samoan (1.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (1.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Icelander (1.2%, a difference of 0.010%), South American (1.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Samoan (1.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Yaqui (1.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (1.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 82.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 1.2% | 
| New Zealanders | 81.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 1.2% | 
| Somalis | 80.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 1.2% | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 80.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 1.2% | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 79.3 /100 | #142 | Good 1.2% | 
| Alsatians | 79.3 /100 | #143 | Good 1.2% | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 79.3 /100 | #144 | Good 1.2% | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 77.9 /100 | #145 | Good 1.2% | 
| Samoans | 77.7 /100 | #146 | Good 1.2% | 
| Icelanders | 76.3 /100 | #147 | Good 1.2% | 
| Ghanaians | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 1.2% | 
| Kenyans | 75.9 /100 | #149 | Good 1.2% | 
| South Americans | 75.6 /100 | #150 | Good 1.2% | 
| Yaqui | 74.8 /100 | #151 | Good 1.2% | 
| Hondurans | 72.5 /100 | #152 | Good 1.2% | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 69.4 /100 | #153 | Good 1.2% | 
| Uruguayans | 68.8 /100 | #154 | Good 1.2% | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 1.2% | 
| Hawaiians | 68.5 /100 | #156 | Good 1.2% | 
| Immigrants | South America | 67.0 /100 | #157 | Good 1.2% | 
| Arabs | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 1.2% |