Jordanian vs Immigrants from Chile Male Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from Chile
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from Chile
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Chile Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,761 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,637,346 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 23.2% | 29.3% |
| Range | 18.1% | 26.9% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 12.2% |
| Median | 10.4% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Chile by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Colombian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Laotian (10.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 98.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.6% |