Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Chile Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from Chile
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from Chile
10.4%
MALE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Chile Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,973,645 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,637,346 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 56.2% | 29.3% |
Range | 53.3% | 26.9% |
Mean | 10.9% | 12.2% |
Median | 9.9% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Chile by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Belarus (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Zimbabwean (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Laotian (10.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |