Italian vs Immigrants from Latin America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Italian
Immigrants from Latin America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Italians
Immigrants from Latin America
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
22.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Immigrants from Latin America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,457,060 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,117,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Italian | Immigrants from Latin America |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 13.5% |
| Range | 29.8% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 6.2% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.86% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Immigrants from Latin America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |