Immigrants from Vietnam vs Cuban Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Cuban
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Vietnam
Cubans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam vs Cuban Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,662,958 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,105,745 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.199 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.67%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam | Cuban |
| Minimum | 0.23% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 10.1% |
| Range | 29.6% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.53% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam and Cubans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |