Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Macedonian Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
 Macedonian
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Macedonians
11.3%
DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Macedonian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,739,828 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,658,992 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.80%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Macedonian | 
| Minimum | 4.0% | 2.7% | 
| Maximum | 21.1% | 19.5% | 
| Range | 17.2% | 16.8% | 
| Mean | 11.2% | 11.0% | 
| Median | 11.2% | 11.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 12.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Macedonians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Guyanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Syria (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Philippines (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Europe (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Italy (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Costa Rican (11.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 11.3%  | 
| Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130  | Excellent 11.4%  |