Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Palestinian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Palestinian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Palestinians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Palestinian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,631,986 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,450,834 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.69%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 12.2% | 13.7% |
| Range | 10.0% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Palestinians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |