Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Salvadoran Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Salvadoran
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Salvadorans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Salvadoran Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,631,986 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,824,360 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.546 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.26%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Salvadoran |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 12.2% | 8.9% |
| Range | 10.0% | 7.0% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 5.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Salvadorans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |