Immigrants from Latvia vs Vietnamese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Vietnamese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Vietnamese
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
47.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Vietnamese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,193 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,721,676 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Vietnamese |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 28.4% | 10.1% |
| Range | 28.2% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 5.8% |
| Median | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Vietnamese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |