Immigrants from Ghana vs Vietnamese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
 Vietnamese
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Vietnamese
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
41.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
47.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Vietnamese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,872,719 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,721,676 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.32%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Vietnamese | 
| Minimum | 0.61% | 1.1% | 
| Maximum | 16.2% | 10.1% | 
| Range | 15.6% | 9.0% | 
| Mean | 6.0% | 5.8% | 
| Median | 5.9% | 5.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Vietnamese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189  | Fair 6.2%  |