Immigrants from England vs Nigerian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Nigerian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from England
Nigerians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Nigerian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,842,020 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.950 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,639,431 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Nigerian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 19.4% |
| Range | 73.1% | 17.2% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 6.4% |
| Median | 8.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 0.90% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Nigerians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Lebanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |